"Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>> I'm sure both Canon and Nikon are working on the problem, meanwhile >> millions go about shooting with their 'flawed' Dslrs. > >You are putting words in my mouth and that is wrong. I never said the >DSLRs were flawed. I did not say I theorized all from one test >simply pointed out what was seen and that the Tamron proved to be a >very good lens for digital. Your "nya nya" comment is childish >and at this point I see a need to terminate this thread or at least my >responses to it. Please believe what you like, especially if >it makes you feel better. By putting quotes on a word, I do not put it in your mouth. That, is childish. I am merely discussing something, not arguing nor putting anyone down. It seems that you know two 'artists' who have or are buying this Tamrom lens so it must be better. Perhaps, is all I'm saying. I have a 20-35 USM that has never shown any such effects on my 10d. This I say from personal experience. amen Jim Davis Nature Photography http://www.kjsl.com/~jbdavis/ Reply in plain text only please! * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
