On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:40:54 +0900, Karen Nakamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>Have you thought about the 28-70 or 24-70mm f/2.8 L lenses? > >I have the 28-135 IS but was a bit disappointed in its softness. I >got a 28-70mm L lens for a reasonably good price and am happy/er. It might be sharper on a tripod, but it won't be sharper handheld. I don't like tripods :-) Not to mention it's zoom range is not so great and it's much heavier. >I also just bought a 16-35mm f/2.8 L lens and am excited to test it >out on my 10D. Also a nice lens, but a tripod is also needed. And it's not wide enough for real wide angle. And again, a heavy lens. Plus, both those lenses are not only very heavy, but very expensive. I've certainly considered all lenses, I just love IS. -- Norton - all around good guy * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
