Skip wrote:
We bought our 5D bodies primarily because of the 35mm sensor, wringing
WA performance out of our 20Ds finally got to us. The extra res, for
instance, was only icing on the cake.
That being said, we're more than delighted with the improvement in
overall image quality compared to our 20Ds. Colors are richer, tonal
transitions are smoother, detail is better (not necessarily sharper)
and the overall "feel" of the image strikes us as better.
I have found the 5D to go through batteries faster than the 20D, but
not so much as to be a problem, more on the lines of 600 images per vs
800 per battery for the 20D.
Skip Middleton
Thanks, Skip! :-)
Exactly what I wanted to know... Damn! Now I've got to start saving my
pennies again!
Cheers!
--
David Young,
Logan Lake, BC
CANADA.
Personal Web-site at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
