On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Nottingham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: >> The issue I have is that with the desktop refresh in 5.2, we now have >> packages with broken dependencies that we can't fix yet. > > Actually, there are some ways. What is the policy on packages that would > conflict with older EL releases (5.1) but not newer ones (5.2)? >
I don't think we have one. We have dealt with the older policy where things conflicted with 5.1 but not 5.0. What exactly are the packages having problems? -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
