On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:20:34AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 02:09:29PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Stephen John Smoogen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > I don't think we have one. We have dealt with the older policy where > > > things conflicted with 5.1 but not 5.0. > > > > > > What exactly are the packages having problems? > > > > gtkhtml3 was rebased in 5.2, changing ABI. We can ship (in EPEL) > > a gtkhtml38 package, but it will conflict at the file level with > > gtkhtml3 from 5.1 and earlier. > > Would that be an issue? And I think that it should be in RHEL 5.2, not > in EPEL? But I am not a customer, so...
Ok, I am dumb. Still, why didn't RHEL people add the gtkhtml38 package in RHEL 5.2? This is quite strange, isn't RHEL supposed to keep ABI compatibility? -- Pat _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
