On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrice Dumas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: >> > I don't see why it is forbidden in EPEL. I see it as being something >> > we haven't dealt with before... but I remember a couple of early >> > packages that we stuck in EPEL first then RHEL took up because it >> > fixed broken things.. or maybe that was CentOS doing it first. Either >> > case, I just want the user to not be borked. >> >> Conflict with RHEL packages is not allowed. > > It was discussed at one point to add gtkhtml38 to 5.2, but it was > decided against it with the idea of putting it in EPEL. Given that, I don't > see how this would be an issue. > Could we get a direct dialog with the RHEL steering committee (or whatever the governing body is) on this?
> In any case, I'm pretty sure RHEL product people know where to find me. > Building... > > Bill > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
