On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 02:09:29PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > I don't think we have one. We have dealt with the older policy where > > things conflicted with 5.1 but not 5.0. > > > > What exactly are the packages having problems? > > gtkhtml3 was rebased in 5.2, changing ABI. We can ship (in EPEL) > a gtkhtml38 package, but it will conflict at the file level with > gtkhtml3 from 5.1 and earlier.
The solution could be, in RHEL, to have gtkhtml38 obsolete gtkhtml3 versions with version <= 3.8. It cannot be done in EPEL since obsoleting RHEL packages is not allowed. gtkhtml3 would be brought in either by devel dependencies, or by dependencies on the soname. -- Pat _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
