2009/3/29 Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]>: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:41:20 +0300 > Manuel Wolfshant <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd suggest: >> - pushes occur once per month and take into account the following 3 >> rules: 1. at least one month in testing, as we have now (unless >> security fix) 2. push to stable if karma reaches a level N>0 ("N" to >> be defined) and time in testing >= 4 weeks >> 3. push to stable if karma >=0 and the package was in testing "long >> enough" (not less than 4 weeks; maybe 12 ?) > > So, this would be a slower progression than we have now, right?
Slow isn't the same thing as stable, I think we need to remember that. > > And how many people are we likely to have add karma? > It seems not too used in the Fedora world, and I am sure there are > fewer EPEL users. ;) > > Any other input out there? > I was thinking this too. Many package I use/maintain have a small user-base. So, the likelyhood of Karma happening is nil. In Fedora it doesn't happen, and in EPEL I am nearly positive it won't. > kevin > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > > _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
