On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Manuel Wolfshant <[email protected]> wrote:
> which is why I suggested the automatic push (unless the package exhibited > problems and received negative karma) after 3 months. which is half the > release cycle of the main distro. I still don't think that's a good idea. I maintain a few niche packages (supybot-fedora and supybot-koji) which are semi-critical to Fedora infrastructure (provides very easy methods to get info out of pkgdb, FAS, and Koji on IRC). I can count the number of users of these packages on one hand (I would say one finger, but I know Kevin uses at least supybot-fedora ;) ) Does this mean that they're not of high quality just because no one uses them? Of course not. Same thing for Michael's packages I'd assume. A three month wait to get stuff into stable just seems WAY too long. As Kevin has already said, delay !=stable. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
