On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:24:19AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

> Note that a while back we discussed if EPEL is in need of a "steering
> comittee" which implies elections and such. We decided that it was much
> more a SIG than a Project. I don't know if that needs to be addressed
> by fesco. 

To some degree, this is semantics.  Let's instead:

1. Figure out what is broken;
2. How to fix it;
3. Meet regularly to keep stuff on track;
4. Keep a clear set of tasks needed/done.

After that is moving, we can address if anyone needs to volunteer for
summary execution and replacement by a new regime.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41

Attachment: pgpNrdtSHzpyx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list

Reply via email to