On 14.06.2009 00:56, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Jeff Sheltren<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jun 12, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >>> IMHO it's time for the steering committee to say "Sorry, we screwed up, >>> we all step down; the last thing we do it to make sure a new steering >>> committee is formed somehow" >> I would be glad to step down if I thought it were the best thing to do, but >> I don't think that it is. We have trouble even getting more than one or two >> non-steering committee members to the meetings (when we do have them!). >> What makes you think that we could find enough interested/motivated people >> to replace the entire committee? I'm under the impression that EPEL is >> popular with end users but there aren't many in the user pool who are >> willing or able to step up and help make EPEL better. > I also have to agree on that. If we all step down... who is left?
Who knows? Just give it a try, maybe new people will show up. And as mentioned in another mail: I think it's fine and actually a good thing if some of the current members try to get into the Committee again -- a bit fresh blood might be enough to get things into a better shape. And the last reorganization of the Steering committee iirc was a year ago, so IMHO it's time for another one, as committees like Board and FESCo do elections once a year as well (and no, I don't want to say that we need a election; I'm actually not even sure if it's better with or without one). > [...] Cu knurd _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
