Mike McGrath ([email protected]) said: > Should we have a stronger effort to replace older RHEL packages if we put > them in their own namespace and don't conflict? > > This is sort of a nuanced problem since RHEL5 doesn't feel nearly as old > as RHEL4 did at this point in it's release cycle. But still, people do > want newer versions of these packages.
This seems like a good way to fracture the platform to me; sure, someone may want a new MySQL, in isolation, but I'm not sure it really helps from a long term-standpoint if other EPEL packages would then have to worry about working with 3 versions of MySQL. Bill _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
