On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:16:58PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > This would be a totally seperate 'epel-bleeding' or > 'epel-newer-versions' repo?
If we did this, we would be best served with an entirely new brand/name. Aside from the challenges of Eh-pull/Ee-pull and acronyms in general, there is also a brand expectation around EPEL. EPEL is the stable, stolid, same-old-you-can-rely-upon moving at the pace of RHEL itself. An exciting, new, updated parallel/conflicting package set should have a new name and identity. - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
pgpOgl3SNy1fT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
