Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
what's the proper way to distinguish epel from fedora in the spec file?
i'd like to add
ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64
on epel but not in case of fedora in a package (since there is no java
on ppc on epel). but what's the current recommended way to do so?
unfortunately %{?rhel} is not defined even in rhel-5 so what else can i
it is defined. See for instance
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libprelude/devel/libprelude.spec?revision=1.49&view=markup
which separates the BRs for RHEL5 from the rest
use to distinguish it from fedora?
thanks in advance.
ps. anyway it'd be useful to put into the epel packaging guidelines.
--
Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416
IT manager NoBug Consulting SRL
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
_______________________________________________
epel-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
