On 11/11/2009 05:13 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tuesday 10 November 2009 08:15:58 pm BJ Dierkes wrote: >> On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Steve Traylen wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Manuel Wolfshant >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Farkas Levente wrote: >>>>> hi, >>>>> what's the proper way to distinguish epel from fedora in the spec >>>>> file? >>>>> i'd like to add >>>>> ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 >>>>> on epel but not in case of fedora in a package (since there is no >>>>> java >>>>> on ppc on epel). but what's the current recommended way to do so? >>>>> unfortunately %{?rhel} is not defined even in rhel-5 so what else >>>>> can i >> >> Is there any problem with: >> >> %if %{el5} >> ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 >> %endif > yes nothing defines %{el5} and you would get a failure on all targets > the correct way to handle it would be > > %if 0%{?rhel} > 1 > ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 > %endif
which is still not working for those who not install the extra packages buildsys-macros and of course won't work with rhel 6 where these exclude shouldn't have to defined. so until now no one send a general good solution:-( -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
