On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Adam Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason I wanted to bring this up is that we say in our policy that > we do not ship packages that are shipped by RedHat in RHEL. But this > being a subscription channel that is not extremely popular, do we want > to revise that policy to say that we don't ship packages that are not > in the base channel of desktop/workstation/server/ap as those are the > most common or do we want to stick to the current policy quite > strictly?
In what context was it brought up? I'm inclined to think that we just go with Base/Virt/Clustering/ClusterStorage (the things you get with AP). We already ship 389 in EPEL, which is the upstream for RHDS. I don't really see nagios as being any different. On another note, Nagios for monitoring HPC deployments? Seriously? :) _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
