On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Jon Stanley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Adam Miller > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The reason I wanted to bring this up is that we say in our policy that >> we do not ship packages that are shipped by RedHat in RHEL. But this >> being a subscription channel that is not extremely popular, do we want >> to revise that policy to say that we don't ship packages that are not >> in the base channel of desktop/workstation/server/ap as those are the >> most common or do we want to stick to the current policy quite >> strictly? > > In what context was it brought up? I'm inclined to think that we just > go with Base/Virt/Clustering/ClusterStorage (the things you get with > AP). We already ship 389 in EPEL, which is the upstream for RHDS. I > don't really see nagios as being any different. >
Honestly not sure, I came in half way through the conversation trying to defend EPEL for not shipping (or should not be shipping) something that RedHat does already. > On another note, Nagios for monitoring HPC deployments? Seriously? :) Agreed, I'd go ganglia. > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list > -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
