Hello... On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 21:13 +0200, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 01/13/2010 06:11 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Matthew Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:41:00AM -0800, Christopher wrote: > >> > >>> Possibly RH could use a one-higher Epoch in their channels. Everybody > >>> wins. > >>> > >> That's the path of madness. Let's please not encourage it. > >> > >> > > > > We also checked and rpm doesn't allow us to use an EPOCH of -1 (for > > even more madness). > > > > I think in the end, we are going to either rebuild what they have in > > that channel OR not ship it. Joy. > > > > > or recommend using yum-priorities and use priority=1 for base / updates > / RHN and >=2 for EPEL. >
cost works in default RHEL5 from man yum.conf cost relative cost of accessing this repository. Useful for weighing one repo's packages as greater/less than any other. defaults to 1000 /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo could contain cost=1001 yes? no? maybe? I use cost=100 so my local repo always wins against rhn > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list -- Christopher McCrory "The guy that keeps the servers running" [email protected] http://www.pricegrabber.com Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is no defense. I tried it. Only tinfoil works. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
