Iain Arnell wrote: > The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest > primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in > the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not > beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over > the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of > orphaned rpms.
Indeed, a branch request is in... Apparently it was deliberate to do this, grumbles have been sent in the appropriate directions. Mark _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
