Mark Chappell wrote: > Iain Arnell wrote: >> The rpm is there, but it's no longer referenced in the latest >> primary.xml. It seems to have been in the original beta2, but not in >> the latest refresh. In fact, it looks like the beta2-refresh (why not >> beta3?) was prepared and createrepo'd elsewhere and simply copied over >> the top of the existing beta directory leaving a whole bunch of >> orphaned rpms. > > Indeed, a branch request is in.
Or not, It's perl-MIME-Types I requested.... Mark _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
