On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 15:18, Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's for a Fedora 12 bug report. The proposed final patch replaces just > a few lines. No EPEL4 specific bugs mentioned. Not even the jump from > 0.7.2 to 1.0.1 was warned about. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Package_maintenance_and_update_policy > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#How_does_Fedora_Project_ensure_the_quality_of_the_packages_in_EPEL.3F > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#How_long_are_EPEL_packages_updated.3F > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#How_can_we_be_sure_that_someone_will_maintain_the_packages_until_end_of_life_of_the_distribution_the_packages_were_built_for.3F > > Hmmm... a clever combination of FAQs. > The best thing about EPEL is that there are no " the EPEL project leaders" beyond those that are interested in the project. Since you have expressed a lot of interest in things.. what are your ideas on how we can fix this problem? 1) We should remove the FAQ documents? 2) Would you like to be the EPEL-EL4 Tsar to deal with these issues? 3) Etc? -- Stephen J Smoogen. “The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.” Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things."" — Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
