On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:20:49 -0700 Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 11:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 12/13/2010 09:24 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:47:54 -0700 > >> Orion Poplawski<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Ah, I didn't catch the multilib aspect (32-bit missing on x86_64). > >>> So, this needs to be fixed in the EPEL multilib compose? > >> > >> It can't be. It's the way it is in the rhel repos. We could copy > >> and re-create the rhel repos, but thats not something I think we > >> want to do. > >> > >> kevin > > > > What I meant was - could we exclude items that require > > gcc-gfortran(x86-32) from the EPEL x86_64 repos? > > > > Does anyone know how I/we can fix this? Drop the Requires: gcc-gfortran%{_isa} and it will work. Maybe someone should mention this in the guidelines; this won't work on any Fedora or RHEL until x86_64 gfortran is made to provide gcc-gfortran(x86-32)... [Although I don't know if 64-bit gfortran ran with -m32 produces the same modules as 32-bit gfortran] -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor [email protected] _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
