On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:27:42 -0700 Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> What I meant was - could we exclude items that require > >>> gcc-gfortran(x86-32) from the EPEL x86_64 repos? > >>> > >> Does anyone know how I/we can fix this? > > Drop the Requires: gcc-gfortran%{_isa} and it will work. > > > > Maybe someone should mention this in the guidelines; this won't > > work on any Fedora or RHEL until x86_64 gfortran is made to provide > > gcc-gfortran(x86-32)... [Although I don't know if 64-bit gfortran > > ran with -m32 produces the same modules as 32-bit gfortran] > This works perfectly fine on Fedora because gcc-gfortran.i686 is > present in the x86_64 repo. > I guess dropping the %{_isa} would prevent the broken dep at the > expense of perhaps being useless.
Oh, you are correct. Seems as gcc-gfortran is the only gcc package that is multilib'd. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor [email protected] _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
