Hi, I do see that hwloc 1.4 in EPEL6 can cause a lot of trouble given the fact that hwloc 1.1 is now available in RHEL6 (when I was creating hwloc package it was not in RHEL6 and in fact I was the major advocate to include it in RHEL6). I will revoke the request.
I'm not sure about EPEL5 - hwloc 1.1 is now very old compared with hwloc 1.4 Should I revoke the request as well? Thanks Jirka On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Orion Poplawski <[email protected]> wrote: > hwloc 1.4 has been submitted as an update to EPEL5 and 6: > > <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0500/hwloc-1.4-1.el5> > <https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-0501/hwloc-1.4-1.el6> > > There are two problems with this: > > - hwloc 1.1 is now in RHEL6: > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/hwloc-1.1-0.1.el6.src.rpm > - hwloc 1.1 has a soname of libhwloc.so.1, 1.4 has libhwloc.so.4, although > nothing in RHEL5/6 or EPEL5/6 appears to depend on it. > > -- > Orion Poplawski > Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 > NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell Lane [email protected] > Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
