On 19 February 2012 16:35, Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:21:25 +0100 > Jiri Hladky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I do see that hwloc 1.4 in EPEL6 can cause a lot of trouble given the >> fact that hwloc 1.1 is now available in RHEL6 (when I was creating >> hwloc package it was not in RHEL6 and in fact I was the major advocate >> to include it in RHEL6). I will revoke the request. >> >> I'm not sure about EPEL5 - hwloc 1.1 is now very old compared with >> hwloc 1.4 Should I revoke the request as well? > > Since hwloc is not in RHEL5, I think you can update it to 1.4 as long > as it's not a incompatible upgrade. Will people using 1.1 there see any > problems? Will they have to manually do anything to use 1.4? If not, > and it's compatible it's up to the maintainer.
Presumably, a hwloc14 package would be a possibility for EL6? (aside: quite astonished that RH chose to package up 1.1 for rhel6). Jonathan. _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
