On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 05:55 +0000, Zhiwei Zhu wrote: > It seems there is some kind of intersection between epel and pip. Take > TurboGears for example. epel7 does provide the rpm of TurboGears but > doesn’t guarantee it could be installed
I'm pretty sure repoclosure issues are considered bugs. Most likely, you are seeing missing deps because EL 7 is not out yet, and as such most stuff hasn't been built yet in EPEL properly. > I thought all the rpms on epel were supposed to be able to be > installed, but I might be wrong. There is no point in providing an RPM which can't be installed, so it can only be a bug, which can be resolved by either removing the uninstallable rpm or building the missing dependencies. Please, do report the bug. -- Mathieu _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
