Hi Mathieu, Toshio,

I am really glad of receiving your responses.
I am clear about the situation now, though the final decision on tg1 hasn’t 
been made.

Tricky thing for us is that we may need to support both el5 and el7 (yeah, not 
el6 and el7), while the tg1 on epel5 is 1.0.9.
We have to consider carefully before making any decision.

Do you have any idea about tg2 on epel7? Because currently the dependency chain 
of it on epel7 is broken as well.


------------------------------
Best Regards
Jacky

From: epel-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org 
[mailto:epel-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Toshio Kuratomi
Sent: Friday, 14 March 2014 5:16 PM
To: EPEL Development List
Subject: Re: EPEL Dependency broken for TurboGears-1.1.3-8.el7.noarch


On Mar 13, 2014 10:57 PM, "Zhiwei Zhu" 
<z_...@wargaming.net<mailto:z_...@wargaming.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>
>
> Thanks for sharing this. It seems there is no straightforward solution for 
> this kind of issue.
>
>
>
> It seems there is some kind of intersection between epel and pip. Take 
> TurboGears for example. epel7 does provide the rpm of TurboGears but doesn’t 
> guarantee it could be installed (epel5 didn’t have this issue, not sure for 
> epel6). This is also applicable to TurboGears2 on epel7 which is supposed to 
> be not old. Then I am not sure why we have TurboGears on epel7? I thought all 
> the rpms on epel were supposed to be able to be installed, but I might be 
> wrong.
>
>
>
> I have just installed TurboGears using pip (current TurboGears on pip is 
> version 1.5.x). Probably  we consider migrate our project to TurboGears 1.5.x 
> or even TurboGears2.

I maintain tg1 (the turbogears package) in epel6.  I'm very interested in not 
maintaining it for epel 7.  It's currently Been branched to the beta epel 7 
repo because it's a dependency of python-fedora which is needed to get fedpkg 
working on epel 7.  Before epel 7 comes out of beta I need to figure out with 
the rest of the fedora infrastructure team what to do about that.  One option 
is that we'd drop the tg1 portions of python-fedora in our epel 7 package and 
remove tg1.  If we think we can migrate or code away from tg1 in a timely 
manner this is likely what I'll push for.

Someone else can, of course, pick up maintenance of the tg1 stack of they need 
it.

-Toshio

[wargaming.net]
EgzO3mXGcK

This e-mail may contain CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION and/or 
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION intended solely for the recipient 
and, therefore, may not be retransmitted to any party outside of the 
recipient's organization without the prior written consent of the sender. If 
you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately by 
telephone or reply e-mail and destroy the original message without making a 
copy. Wargaming.net accepts no liability for any losses or damages resulting 
from infected e-mail transmissions and viruses in e-mail attachment. kgzO3mXGcg
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel

Reply via email to