On 16 June 2014 12:10, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > Greetings. > > One thing I missed in the RHEL7 release was that there is a repository > now called 'rhel-extras'. > > For RHEL6 this contains upgrade packages (for in place rhel6->rhel7 > upgrades). > > For RHEL7 this contains (for now) docker and a number of flask packages > that docker-registry needs. > > The policy for this repo is: > https://access.redhat.com/site/support/policy/updates/extras/ > > I'd like to propose that we include this in EPEL7 at least as a repo > that we don't conflict with (ie, as packages are added there, they are > retired from epel). CentOS will be building these packages as part of > it's base collection I think. > > I agree. Is there a way we could (if we wanted to) tie checks with what is in git.centos.org? If it is there then its going to be in the upstream somewhere and would allow us to avoid some conflicts.
> If packages in that repo prove too fast or too slow moving, we can look > at adding parallel installable versions of packages in there in EPEL. > > Thoughts? > > kevin > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list > epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel > > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
