On 25 June 2014 11:27, Michael Stahnke <stah...@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > >> ok, not much discussion here, but it seems like everyone is ok with >> just saying rhel-extras is something we don't conflict with. >> > > One question I have is how long this decision is valid for. Right now, I > think the proposal is the best decision. 3 years from now, we may have > different opinions. 7 years from now, we really might. Does this decision > last the 10 years that RHEL does or can we revisit at some point, if > required? > > Good question.. and leads into my next email about EPEL.next... what do people see as the challenges and future of EPEL. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
