On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:27:32 +0100 Karanbir Singh <mail-li...@karan.org> wrote:
> that would work. There is the whole fundamental issue to then work > through as to how far the epel branch's can diverge from the fedora > codebase ? Secondly, could we find a mechanism that takes this model > and applies it across the board on both sides. Sure. I would hope that maintainers could come to some common agreement on patches, etc. I am hard pressed to think of cases where something wouldn't just be good for both EPEL and CentOS. > > that would also make it easier for this use case : Some of the SIG's > might end up needing to carry the epel configs, not just the -release > rpm, but the yum config, enabled already, in their own release files > to satisfy deps. So, we can get the maintainers of the epel package out of pkgdb. Is there a way to get a list of the CentOS maintainers? kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel