Hi Jim. On 09/25/2014 04:36 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > Earlier this week on the CentOS devel list I proposed an interim method > to help make it easier for centos contributions to flow into epel. > > Essentially the proposal is that CentOS would like a 'curator' group > (name can be determined later) similar to the wrangler's group. > > Members of this group would be responsible for shepherding packages > designated by the various SIG efforts in CentOS through the process of > getting these packages in epel. This means that rather than having an > individual owner, packages would have group ownership. Members of this > group will be required to have access to make package modifications on > the CentOS side so that they meet the packaging standards for EPEL. > Additionally, it would help to have an EPEL proven packager as part of > the group as well in order to help make things move a little quicker. > > Would this be acceptable from an EPEL standpoint? What would be required > from an EPEL perspective to make this happen? > EPEL is for RHEL, Scientific Linux, Oracle Enterprice other than CentOS; would we need of special "curator" group for every distro? CentOS contributions could flow simply by taking part on EPEL and by integrating any special (previously discussed) packaging need .
-- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel