On 27 April 2015 at 12:23, Marco van Leeuwen <mastervanleeu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Somehow I am having trouble reaching the mailing list. I would like to > suggest to add pam_mount and it's dependencies: libHX and hxtools to EPEL7. > I have run tests which indicate that the packages from the fedora package > git repository should just work. I can volunteer to be the maintainer or > co-maintainer for these packages. > > You are reaching the list and sent 2 emails. The list is low traffic and so it can take 2-3 days for replies to happen. > A testbuild for libHX is here: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9577684 > > Best regards, > > Marco van Leeuwen > > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 1:14 AM, ~Stack~ <i.am.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> A few months ago the package 'lis' disappeared from EPEL6. This was very >> sad for me. The version that was there fit my needs but apparently the >> package got orphaned and removed leaving me with nothing at all. >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/lis/ >> >> Since EPEL7 first started, I have been eagerly awaiting a few packages. >> Everything but terminator is now in EPEL7. I have a lot of >> customizations done to terminator and not having it messes with me >> enough that I have yet to switch to any form/variant of RHEL7 at all >> simply because I can't stand trying to do my work on a normal terminal >> shell. :-) Now, I see that EPEL7 is listed as approved for terminator >> and has been for a while, but I still don't see the package in the >> repositories. I don't know what it means to be approved but not in the >> repos... >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/terminator/ >> >> >> What do these two things have in common? The fact that I have tried on >> several occasions to reach out to the developers inquiring about the >> packages. I don't know if the emails I got out of those fedoraproject >> links are not used/watched, or if I got filtered, or if gmail is just >> routing my sent/received emails to /dev/null again... >> >> I was trying not to be an nuisance on the list inquiring about package >> status' all of the time so I thought I would reach out to the devs. >> However, I have sent a few emails with zero response at all (I don't >> know if they even got my emails) and I _really_ don't want to be a >> nuisance by spamming the dev's email. I appreciate their work too much >> to have any desire to be a nuisance! :-D >> >> I poked around on the website and search a bit on the mailing-list but I >> didn't find anything on the most appropriate way to contact devs outside >> of the generic IRC/mailing list approach. So I thought I would ask here. >> >> When I have a question about the status of a package, what is the best >> way to contact that package maintainer? Should I have just been >> submitting my questions to the list the whole time? >> >> >> Thanks! >> ~Stack~ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> epel-devel mailing list >> epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list > epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel > > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel