On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 12:36:44PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: ...snip... > Warning: heresy and rampant speculation ahead! > It's too early to do this now, but I think there's a compelling case > to be made for shifting EPEL from Fedora to Stream at some point. This > would be dependent on getting a solid contributor community > established for Stream, of course. Realistically, I'd say we're a few > years away from making that transition, but I think the Stream > community would be a more natural fit. If CentOS Stream had existed > when EPEL started, I don't think we'd have made EPEL a part of Fedora, > despite the good points Matthew makes below. (In other words, it's not > a foregone conclusion that EPEL should be a part of Stream, and there > are reasons not to do that, but there are also reasons to do that. > That's a problem for Future Us to solve.)
I'm a bit confused here... you seem to be conflating epel and this epel-stream/epel-next. Do you mean both of them? or just the new one would move over? We would need at least shared git (is that still something that might happen someday?) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
