On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 12:38, Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> wrote:
> On 12/11/20 5:04 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 12/12/20 12:12 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > >> There is also a problem if a missing package has been specifically > >> blocked by a module. I think libuv-devel is this way. > > > > If that happens, wouldn't it be blocked in both scenarios > > (module+grobisplitter+tagging and devel-only-component)? Or would > > grobisplitter put them in an additional repo with module_hotfixes=yes? > > > > If that's the case, it might be possible to create a separate repo with > > such packages only and manually tag them there. E.g. after a build I'd > > do `koji tag epel8-buildroot-module-hotfixes foo-devel-1.6-5.el8` and > > the epel8-buildroot-module-hotfixes repo would be available from EPEL 8 > > Koji/mock builds with module_hotfixes=yes. Yes, unlike the rest of this > > proposal, it requires some work (on infra to set up this extra repo and > > on packagers to remember to do the tagging, but that still sounds like > > less work than the grobisplitter proposal for both groups). > > Is there any easy way to tell if a package is explicitly blocked vs just > not being present. > > I thought there was one way by looking at the modules.yaml file and parse through the yaml for artifacts and filter.. however when I was doing that for the EPEL-8 bringup in 2019.. it was not always accurate. > >> We discussed this in the EPEL Steering Committee this week, and your > >> way has alot less "mess with the server and modules" work. > >> It would probably get us up to 75% of the missing packages. > >> > >> If people who have been waiting for packages want to give this a try > >> and show what they did for others to follow, that would be great. > >> I'll probrubly do it for some of the packages I want. And see what > >> type of scripts, patches, and other things are needed. > > > > Let me know if you have a devel package in mind and I can give it a try. > > Can we just jump in and try this out? I'd like to get qpdf-devel > available. If so, I guess I would do: > > fedpkg request-repo --exception qpdf-devel > > right? > > I don't know so I can't answer this. > -- > Orion Poplawski > Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 > NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com > Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
