On 03. 08. 21 2:10, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 01:55:52AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've opened the following two pull requests to introduce %py3_check_import
to EPEL8 and EPEL7:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/31
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epel-rpm-macros/pull-request/32
So far, there has been no response. Is there anybody willing to merge them?
They are manually tested, as indicated in the comments.
When we introduce new macros to Fedora, I strive to backport them to EPELs
if possible, so package maintainers don't need to think "may I use this?" if
they desire EPEL compatibility. However, I don't want to merge my own pull
requests to epel-rpm-macros (unless they are urgent bug fixes).
I can merge them...
Thank you! Both updates now exist:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dfd462a782
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e3b1cc2b6e
A meta question: Should the epel-sig group co-maintain the package?
They could if desired.
I think it is desired. Why wouldn't it be?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
