I think a better system would be to stub the XPCom function and implement those that the extension use and use dbus to communicate. Because firefox is better at handling there extensions.
Olafur Arason On 3/11/07, Reinout van Schouwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > Op zondag 11-03-2007 om 15:02 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Benjamin > Gramlich: > > > Would it ever be possible to allow epiphany to support Firefox > > plugins? > > Epiphany already supports Mozilla plugins such as the Acrobat Reader > plugin. In case you're talking about Firefox extensions: the short > answer is No. The long answer is: Some extensions can be ported (Adblock > is one example) but they cannot run without modification. Javascript-GTK > bindings would need to be written first for that to be feasible at all. > > regards, > > -- > Reinout van Schouwen > > > _______________________________________________ > epiphany-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list > _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
