On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 23:03 +0000, Olafur Arason wrote: > I think a better system would be to stub the XPCom function > and implement those that the extension use and use > dbus to communicate. Because firefox is better at handling > there extensions.
I think the better system is to rewrite the extensions. I have yet to port a well-engineered Firefox extension. My opinion is that Epiphany's extensions should strive to be of better quality and reliability than their Firefox counterparts. PyXPCOM would help immensely with porting extensions *very* easily. Unfortunately, on Ubuntu at least, the python-xpcom package is missing a vital component at the moment. Everything is technically feasible, and the hard parts have been written. It just comes down to some skilled C hacker taking a day or two to package everything together. -- Adam Hooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ epiphany-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
