The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics Modified June 6, 2009, Reviewed March 15, 2011 John Lawrence Reed, Jr. Section 8
johnreed Take 23 - Dark Matter August 8, 2007 Modified 2009 The disparity in the measure of mass in distant galaxies, has caused us to propose a type of matter called the dark-matter. "Today most astronomers and physicists believe that this is the right answer to the puzzle. There is missing matter, which is actually there but which we don't see. This mysterious missing matter is referred to as the dark matter. The dark-matter hypothesis is preferred mostly because the only other possibility --- that we are wrong about Newton's laws, and by extension general relativity --- is too scary to contemplate." Quote taken from "The Trouble With Physics", 2005, Lee Smolin, PhD In the post "johnreed Take 5.1" I briefly introduced a notion for electromagnetic, star formation mechanics, that I call constructive, electromagnetic fusion. The thrust of this idea is that under the extreme conditions of pressure that are believed to exist within star forming galactic clouds, the electromagnetic properties of the relentlessly compressed atoms control[1], such that the internal atomic electromagnetic structure of each atom is aligned in the most efficient manner to preserve atomic integrity. Externally each atom shifts position, maximizing the efficiency of the stable internal structure. As the pressure continues to increase, the range of the efficiently ordered internal electromagnetic atomic fields extend beyond the physical limit of each atom, and as the atomic matter continues to compress, the aligned fields inside and outside the atom ultimately "constructively" join [1]. A collapse of the cloud core ensues, as the join of many electromagnetically optimized atoms, into one (or perhaps several) superatom(s), [2], releases the less efficiently used, individual atomic, occupied space. The collapsed cloud core takes with it a surface covering of primarily, non-super condensed internal galactic cloud matter. This covering may include attendant, partially "efficient" condensed matter, that we see today as sun spots [3]. A shock wave results from this process such that much of the surface covering of the collapsed star core is blown away in (nearly) all directions in space. Much of this debris ultimately returns to the newly formed star, while much of it returns to the spatial location consistent with its origin, now far outside the surface of the collapsed cloud core, and passes around the star to be thrown into a distant star space orbit. The controlling process here is super- electromagnetic rather than gravitational (See johnreed Take 25). The creation of any or all atomic elements during the compression process may occur prior to the collapse and control of the most efficiently constructed atoms. Super radio electromagnetic current, and plasma polar arcs may extend from the collapsed cloud core and ultimately join near the plane of the ecliptic to complete a circuit. These polar arcs travel around the newly collapsed star to focus the formation of the inner planets along the plane of the ecliptic. >From my rough guesstimates, based on the average diameter of atoms and nuclei, and on a varying diameter for the sun, such a collapse could free up at mimimum, 96% of the space previously occupied by the individual atoms. Again by similar calculations, this could encompass a volume that extends minimally to the outermost terrestrial planets. This process replaces neutron stars, and blackholes. It also nicely incorporates all the exotic cosmology items we have so far observed, that I am aware of. The matter that we don't see (measure), and call dark or non- illuminating, or reflecting matter is, accounted for in part (or in full), by the super condensed “randamajor” matter inside the star cores [4]. The reason we do not detect any gravitational signature here, is due to the same reason we cannot detect the so called gravitational waves. Gravitational waves do not exist. Point like radio sources in the cosmos are called quasars and blazars. Their spectra could not be connected to any known element. In 1963 Maarsten Schmidt recognized that the spectra was similar to the spectra of hydrogen but shifted by an enormous amount toward the red end of the spectrum. This was the largest red shift ever found and was interpreted in the usual Doppler fashion, based on our sensory detection mechanism. Quasars are thought to have formed in the early days of the Big Bang and to have at their centers our subjectively derived gravitationally caused black hole. Consider my proposed atomic structure (see take 25) and the formation of stars. Where a constructive electromagnetic fusion process occurs on the order of: [o+o=O] rather than [o+o=2o]. In other words the cores of stars do not collapse under gravitational force but rather, join in a counteraction to relentless pressure, in a fusion process, and collapse as one giant space optimized atom whose spectra is shifted by size into the red. This core then acts in a manner similar to the theoretical activity attributed to black holes. Endnotes (1) I think that the primary principle involved here can be studied in the laboratory at Einstein-Bose condensate temperatures. See "johnreed Take 15" and supplemental post and “johnreed take 25). For example the use of differing amounts of a pure substance to determine its effect on the resultant condensate might provide constraints on the number of atoms contiguously condensed. If such constraints exist, within our ability to measure, it would tend to falsify my cosmological premise for a single super-atom. However, it would still support my proposed atomic structure and a multiple superatom star core. A condensate from iron might display a retention time as the temperature is raised due to the efficiency of its atomic structure. (2) This concept conceptually, cannot be readily assimilated within the mathematical models used to describe our "particle equilibrium" view of atomic structure. However it falls out as a logical consequence of the "johnreed Take 6" view, which ultimately reduces to a field view, built not from particles, but from physically "interlocked threads" of electromagnetic radiation (consider tired light, as monopoles or dipoles, or both), independent of any background other than (perhaps) the absence (attenuation) of the electromagnetic field itself. (3) The name I have given to this proposed new state of matter is the "randamajor". For the sake of communication however, I have called it a super dynamo and super atom, in past posts. Such an electromagnetic, constructive fusion process, is predicted to ultimately result in a reasonably stable, possibly contiguous star core, mirroring the atomic structure of iron. The atomic structure it is based on predicts that electric current passes through the center of the atom (see Takes 6 and 15). I call that atomic structure the "randaminor". The reader might initially view this proposal with incredulity. A super atom indeed! If so, she/he will then experience the response I had on first learning of our gravitationally predicted "blackhole". Laughable but for our deeply ingrained a priori notion for mass generated gravity. And on the face, a reductio ad absurdem argument against the idea for mass generated gravity. However it was not the problem I had with blackholes that led me to electromagnetic constructive fusion. The elimination of the blackhole was a collateral benefit. The randamajor "fell" out of the randaminor. The Einstein- Bose Condensate may be a laboratory example. Unfortunately the entire construct required that I address Newtonian gravitation in the same manner I had to eventually address atomic structure. Essentially from scratch (See johnreed Catch 22 and 1st addendum to same), while remaining consistent with the experimental data. (4) This idea will bear also on the variable mathematical tool called the cosmological constant, dark energy and the expansion of the universe, but I would tread lightly in that area. My recent posts on the falsity of mass generated gravity, eliminate outright the central idea for a big bang. While the Doppler interpreted evidence for an expanding universe supports the notion for a big bang, its supporting data exists independently. Even so, I believe that, those data will eventually be explained differently. For example: it is clear that each star emits electromagnetic radiation. Therefore each star is expanding on that basis alone, while its core is contracting. Additionally the red shifted light may be the consequence of the randamajor star core. (5) I began my quest seeking to conceptually explain atomic structure physics. I held similar beliefs as do some of the string theorists, ten years before they existed, in that they believe that finding a mathematical model that fits all contingencies of the 'current' paradigm, would surely have to be the correct model, however contrived, and however many dimensions and massaging constants it contained. Using the least action consistent mathematics in a least action consistent universe, this notion is on the face, absurd. I took this notion a step further, early on. I believed that if I found a coherent conceptual explanation for all the diverse phenomena and the anomalies, it would certainly be a good argument. It turned out to be an argument where the mathematical model falls out as a logical consequence of the (also as it turned out), revised conceptual model. Tuesday, March 15, 2011 Have a good time. johnreed -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
