Oh you darling darling SS!!! I can just see you in your leather jacket, tight uniform, smoking a cigarette, your pants bulging so attractively, outshone only by your massive chest! I can see so many fashion accessaries that I am overwhelmed, especially by that charm bracelet! Your pockets bulge with mysterious outlines of which I find most noteworthy the coins, dice, packs of cards, and OMFGIHA is that a six inch triangular ruler protruding top down from your side pocket??? Will you offer me a penny for my further thoughts, due to their worthlessness causing THESE to be not worth TWO cents???
I await your response with bated breath, having swallowed the bait, getting hooked in the process, being reeled in by your enchanting lines, up up and away to your whiplash rod! Oh darling SS, will you catch me with a fishnet, handle me carefully, and put me in your creel? OMGPFMOM!!! Lonnie Courtney Clay On Thursday, May 5, 2011 11:39:23 PM UTC-7, Serenity Smiles wrote: > > > > *From:* Serenity Smiles > *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2011 10:01 PM > *To:* awori achoka > *Subject:* Re: [epistemology 12017] Re: What is life?/Royal Slaying > > Ah So, So ha, Ahhh to you Souls, (sold lol), I pray you accept I am only > making light, buying out lol. Osamer Bin Laden, Obama Sin Laden, Nothing > likes timing, Couldn’t be easier, The two sides to the coin, darkness into > light and light into darkness, or, dare, (Please may I; motivation checked > and in the interest of science), continue in that these be the impermanent > thoughts of the “Chi-louts”. What a perfect smokescreen for a royal > getaway, paranoia free and another birth of ethereal existence, a new > controversy to boom business. Why permit things to be easy for conceptual > thought?? No, this would not sell!! Otherwise we would all be able to Buy > into “well that was done well, very civilised”. Authors note here. The > nature of the small letters denoted that the effect to my inner senses > permitted restraint from being rattled, and would have proved that “we” are > capable of rational behaviour lol. > > p.s. my school stopped teaching grammar the year before I started so can > anyone enlighten just where I am supposed to have stuffed the semi-colons > body? “crock of shit”?. [S]He was your Mother at least once! Being on the > theory of energy never dies. Who are the winners, place your bets, where > was the terror?? Please remember guys the laws of the moment now, it is > always only the moment now. Can anyone count the moments like Vietnam in > this war of terror, would anyone want to?? I guess my mind is wittering on > I still pray for a fair X change, please let me be a nun now lol, or at > least find something else for me to do with my precious moments. > > Dip Low?? (Both obscured), Ma See Why??, No, I buy out, this to be read no > more than what it is, meaningless conceptualised thoughts of a bored > nature. Please no photos lol. Cut the advertising of your own projections > please. > > Love and prayers, for the benefit of all sentient beings and others. > > *From:* awori achoka > *Sent:* Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:45 PM > *To:* Serenity Smiles > *Subject:* Re: [epistemology 12017] Re: What is life? > > > Yes, it is a continuum...whose breath and depth we can't measure, since our > existence is subject to it. > > On May 5, 2011 1:41 PM, "Serenity Smiles" <gentle....@hotmail.co.uk> > wrote: > > So, no matter what as long as we are "breathing", what is occurring is a > > whole chain of events, one firing another, one that is "consciousness" > one > > that is "deciphering" one that is "Choosing" etc etc and that each of > these > > events again is not independent in nature but again dependent one upon > the > > other. Is that how you see it too?? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Aworiachoka > > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 6:50 AM > > To: Serenity Smiles > > Subject: Re: [epistemology 12017] Re: What is life? > > > > That is why i define life as a moment in space and time. All that > experience > > we refer to as living, is momentary. > > > > Serenity Smiles <gentle....@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> > >>Main article: Twelve Nidānas > >>The Twelve Nidānas describe a causal connection between the subsequent > >>characteristics or conditions of cyclic existence, each one giving rise > to > >>the next: > >> > >> 1.. Avidyā: ignorance, specifically spiritual ignorance of the nature of > > >> reality[50] > >> 2.. Saṃskāras: literally formations, explained as referring to karma > >> 3.. Vijñāna: consciousness, specifically discriminative[51] > >> 4.. Nāmarūpa: literally name and form, referring to mind and body[52] > >> 5.. Ṣaḍāyatana: the six sense bases: eye, ear, nose, tongue, body and > >> mind-organ > >> 6.. Sparśa: variously translated contact, impression, stimulation (by a > >> sense object) > >> 7.. Vedanā: usually translated feeling: this is the "hedonic tone", i.e. > > >> whether something is pleasant, unpleasant or neutral > >> 8.. Tṛṣṇā: literally thirst, but in Buddhism nearly always used to mean > >> craving > >> 9.. Upādāna: clinging or grasping; the word also means fuel, which feeds > > >> the continuing cycle of rebirth > >> 10.. Bhava: literally being (existence) or becoming. (The Theravada > >> explains this as having two meanings: karma, which produces a new > >> existence, and the existence itself.)[53] > >> 11.. Jāti: literally birth, but life is understood as starting at > >> conception[54] > >> 12.. Jarāmaraṇa: (old age and death) and also > >> śokaparidevaduḥkhadaurmanasyopāyāsa (sorrow, lamentation, pain, sadness, > > >> and misery) > >>Sentient beings always suffer throughout saṃsāra, until they free > >>themselves from this suffering by attaining Nirvana. Then the absence of > >>the first Nidāna—ignorance—leads to the absence of the others. > >> > >>From: Lonnie Clay > >>Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1:05 PM > >>To: episte...@googlegroups.com > >>Subject: Re: [epistemology 12013] Re: What is life? > >> > >>2CANS &-> (AKEETSTEEKA) <-& SNAC2 > >>Enjoy the keys! TRY not to wreck the car, and DEFINITELY avoid getting > >>killed in action on the racecourse, that being par for the course... > >> > >>I am going to enjoy those two cans of beer, being sober by the time the > >>CARAC is returned, and have chips for a snack. I will feed the parrot on > my > >>shoulder as I watch you drive downrange... > >> > >>C/$$+->>IONSNOI <<-+$$\C > >> > >>That one may be a bit tricky to see/ decode - it says > >>congratulations/thanks... The gratu being gratuitous gratuities gratingly > > >>given (and gratefully received) as gifts of dollars, "+-" being leads to > or > >>later, more or less... > >> > >>As a beggar, I am somewhat noisy in asking for alms, please be > considerate > >>rather than kicking me in the crotch... > >> > >>Lonnie Courtney Clay > >> > >> > >>On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:44:53 AM UTC-7, Serenity Smiles wrote: > >> I love your innate characteristics lol lol lol, lots of love, laugh out > >> loud, look of life. How about this for a projection lol. > >> > >> Obama to Clinton 29th April: “Its Ok Hilary, relax, I see no Trumps, I > >> told that Donald to Duck, I played my hand, see (note to C.O. start > >> filming) a full house of has Bin Ladens and a Tripoli of Gadaffis. We’re > > >> buying out not in”. > >> > >> Love and prayers > >> > >> From: Lonnie Clay > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 1:12 AM > >> To: epis...@googlegroups.com > >> Subject: [epistemology 12006] Re: What is life? > >> > >> HMMMH > >> > >> > >> 1) Awareness of Self -->> !Shazam! --->> > >> 2) belief in belief --->> Boredom -->> > >> 3) belief that change is possible --->> Creativity --->> > >> 4) creation of transitional operational functions --->> Reinforcing > --->> > >> 5) transition using belief into belief that other concepts are possible > >> besides belief and change -->> Diversification -->> > >> 6) creation of intuition --->> Frustration -->> > >> 7) creation of inspiration --->> Greed --->> > >> 8) creation of evaluation --->> Foresight -->> > >> 9) creation of planning ---> Gimme !MORE! complexity -->> > >> 10-65535 self development of innate characteristics in ones own state > >> vector. > >> >>> ascent to GOD inspired further possibilities > >> >>> 2**24 ascent to Spirit > >> >>> 2**32 asent to GOD's helper status Deity > >> >>> 2**64 subordinate of GOD > >> >>> 2**256-2 crowding GOD at 2**256-1 innate characteristics... LOL LOL > >> LOL > >> I recently was promoted to Spirit... > >> > >> Lonnie Courtney Clay > >> > >> > >> On Tuesday, May 3, 2011 11:18:06 AM UTC-7, the taoist shaman wrote: > >> lonnie u seem smart , is there an end to self evolution ,. im i > >> crawling twards insanity by being a perfectionest or am i correct or > >> is there a state of "perfection" <------ of corse not perfection but > >> "perfection" compleat is what i think im getting at , is to view ones > >> self as whole to have delusions of grandure. am i too smart for my > >> own good or too stuped > >> > >> On Apr 28, 4:57 am, Lonnie Clay <cla...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> > Very Perceptive! Commence Evolving whenever pleased! Be pleased with > >> > evolving! Bootstrap upwards! > >> > > >> > Lonnie Courtney Clay > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:38:54 AM UTC-7, the taoist shaman > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > LIFE u can't pinpoint life to 1 thing life is death > >> > > death is life a non being existing and hidden shows itself and > >> > > becomes a being , a being existing is visable and hides itself , > >> and > >> > > becomes a non being life is an illusion set before us to see > >> if > >> > > we can solve the riddle , but whats more if we can look through the > >> > > illusion and see reality at all times , but whats more , if we can > >> > > live by the way of reality / truth at all times i like to fight > >> > > for sport , life is a fight cage, i use my opponents aggregations > >> > > against himself and try not to hurt him too bad , and therefore > >> dont > >> > > like to fight, therefore life is not a fight > >> shaickspeer , > >> > > to him life was a stage and all the people actors life is a > >> > > test a game for keeps a battlefield it is likened unto > >> water > >> > > which can flow arownd or crash as wave is the peak of a > >> mountan > >> > > the begining or the end if u see only light u r blind if u see > >> > > only dark u r blind when the 2 combine u have sight life > >> is a > >> > > testing grownd and an opportunity opportunity to evolve ones > >> own > >> > > self that is what separates us from the animals , we can choose > >> to > >> > > evolve into a higher being > >> > > >> > > nominal9 wrote: > >> > > > Insanity Screams...? HAR > >> > > >> > > > On Mar 5, 6:59 am, "Serenity Smiles" <gen...@hotmail.co.uk> > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > Now it is my choice, THIS IS MY PLANET, I am demanding my human > >> rights, > >> > > MY > >> > > > > CHOICE, they LIE!!!!!!!!!!! > >> > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > From: ornamentalmind > >> > > > > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 4:49 PM > >> > > > > To: Epistemology > >> > > > > Subject: [epistemology 11906] Re: What is life? > >> > > >> > > > > chaz...great to see that you are still here kicking the tires > >> on > >> > > > > beliefs! I came here mainly to see if you were still > >> posting....cool! > >> > > >> > > > > On Jan 20, 5:32 pm, chazwin <cha...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > > > > > Your statement says nothing about life. It does not capture > >> any > >> > > > > > essential quality in the meaning of the word. > >> > > > > > Your response could capture any event, but has nothing to say > >> as the > >> > > > > > the question. > >> > > > > > I'd love to hear what you think it means. > >> > > >> > > > > > On Dec 24 2010, 10:11 am, Awori <awo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > > > > > In heated discourse about the meaning of nature---I was one > >> time > >> > > asked > >> > > > > > > to define life. This is what I said: "Life is a moment in > >> space and > >> > > >> > > > > > > time". To my disappointment--I got no reaction from the > >> group. Is > >> > > it > >> > > > > > > because I was absurdly wrong? I have continued to use this > >> response > >> > > as > >> > > > > > > my standard explanation of what life is. Has anyone in out > >> there > >> > > given > >> > > > > > > this age old subject a better look? > >> > > >> > > > > > > AA > >> > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >> Google > >> > > Groups > >> > > > > "Epistemology" group. > >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to epi...@googlegroups.com. > >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > > > epis...@googlegroups.com. > >> > > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > >> > > groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > >> > > >> > - Show quoted text - > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "Epistemology" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to epis...@googlegroups.com. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> epistem...@googlegroups.com. > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > >> > >>-- > >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > >>"Epistemology" group. > >>To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. > >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>mailto:epistemology%...@googlegroups.com. > >>For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > >> > >>-- > >>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > >>"Epistemology" group. > >>To post to this group, send email to episte...@googlegroups.com. > >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>mailto:epistemology%...@googlegroups.com. > >>For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en. > >> > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
