On 3/7/2013 10:30 AM, nominal9 wrote:
I go with the "sequestrate their assets" part... but the letting them go part I'm against... As "entrepreneurs", such people would just "steal" their way back up to wealth, without actually creating anything beneficial for any economy, like jobs or even "products" to speak of.....



Hi Nom,

Not to be merely contrarian, but how is *wealth* created in your theory of the world? Does "risk" exist in any positive sense in your model? I would like to understand your thoughts. If there is a way to define wealth creation that is not, in some way, a form of exploitation of one entity of another, please explain. Can entrepreneurship be a mutually beneficial process of wealth generation to and for all involved in a way that does not require top-down controls? I think it can...


--
Onward!

Stephen


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Epistemology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to