Socrates, I think we need a proton-magnetic theory too. ...Because there is strong binding within the nucleus. Moreover quarks' speed is rated higher than electron's. Quarks have long life and this is indication that quarks inherently have energy. Sounds mundane? Mike Atovigba.
On 4/19/14, epistemology@googlegroups.com <epistemology@googlegroups.com> wrote: > ============================================================================= > Today's topic summary > ============================================================================= > > Group: epistemology@googlegroups.com > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/topics > > - Heisenberg Uncertainty principle: (ab ≠ ba) and Electron. [1 Update] > http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/68fd4715e1dec035 > > > ============================================================================= > Topic: Heisenberg Uncertainty principle: (ab ≠ ba) and Electron. > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/t/68fd4715e1dec035 > ============================================================================= > > ---------- 1 of 1 ---------- > From: socratus sadovnik <isocra...@gmail.com> > Date: Apr 19 08:20AM -0700 > Url: http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/msg/25d3a71b1f60995a > > Heisenberg Uncertainty principle: (ab ≠ ba) and Electron. > > ==. > > Sir Arthur Eddington wrote: > > We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two, > > because one and one are two. We are finding > > that we must learn a great deal more about `and'. > > Why? > > Because one (1) can be different from another one (1). > > Take electron - symbol (e) > > Take proton - symbol (p) > > They are absolute different particles. > > And interaction between electron and proton is not the same > > than interaction between proton and electron: ep ≠ pe > > ( non-commutative algebra. Heisenberg Uncertainty principle) > > =================== . . . > > The electron (particle/wave) is not the same as the proton. > > They are absolute different substances / matter. > > # > > There is EM wave theory, there isn't proton-magnetic theory. > > Energy/ information can be transferred only by electromagnetic fields. > > And in 1895 Lorentz proved that there isn’t em waves without Electron > > No other particle can do this work. > > We don’t have a theory about protono-magnetic fields that can > > transfer an energy/information. > > In our earthly world there is only one (1) unique fundamental > > particle - electron (!) what can transfer energy as an information. > > ==.. > > Electron has six ( 6 ) formulas: > 1900, 1905. Planck and Einstein found the energy of electron: E=h*f. > 1916. Sommerfeld found the formula of electron : e^2=ah*c, > 1928. Dirac found two more formulas of electron’s energy: > +E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2 (positron). > According to QED in interaction with vacuum electron’s > energy is infinite: E= ∞ > Electron tied with atom by the energy: E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV > And pure proton doesn't have formula, it has only "letter". > =. > It means that electron is active particle (pure energetic particle) > and proton is passive mass-particle. > These particles have absolute different structure and matter. > > Therefore the interaction between electron and proton is not the same > > than interaction between proton and electron: ep ≠ pe > > (Heisenberg Uncertainty principle) > > ==.. > > Somebody wrote another example. > > A thing called “shoe” and a thing called “ sock” along with > > the operator ”and” which combines “shoe” and “sock” things. > > If you play around with it, you will find > > that the “ order “ is fairly important. > ======== . .. . > P.S. > LinkedIn *Theoretical > Physics*<http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=3091009&trk=anet_ug_hm&goback=%2Enpv_293465668_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_nav*4responsive*4tab*4profile_*1%2Egmp_3091009>: > > *Discussions*<http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Theoretical-Physics-3091009?trk=groups_item_detail-h-dsc&goback=%2Enpv_293465668_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_nav*4responsive*4tab*4profile_*1%2Egmp_3091009%2Egde_3091009_member_5862836968626356225> > : > > Heisenberg Uncertainty principle: (ab ≠ ba) and Electron. > *http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Theoretical-Physics-3091009 > <http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Theoretical-Physics-3091009>?* > *====* > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Epistemology" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Epistemology" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to epistemology+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to epistemology@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
