ChangWoo, There currently is no implementation of OBR. If you look earlier in this thread you will see talk of investigating an OBR repository adaptor for p2. Thomas Hallgren showed interest in implementing such a repository adaptor. Thomas, do you have any interest in doing/contributing this work to Equinox? Perhaps start in the incubator?
For your Filter issue. I would open a bug against the apache version of
OBR. It should not be using the framework Filter implementation to
construct Filter objects.
Tom
From: Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org>
Date: 01/22/2008 02:09 AM
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
RFC 112 is not a standard, but please note that > and < are specifically
allowed. Rewriting bindex will not fix the problem if you want to
interoperate, you have to use another filter impl to achieve that.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 21 jan 2008, at 16:18, ChangWoo Jung wrote:
I have been using OBR implementation from Apache Felix and it uses
"BundleContext#createFilter" to create the filter which throws the
exception in the equinox framework at the end. So if I don't modify
the bindex not to generate the < or > operator, the repo xml can't
be digested in the OBR bundle for bundle resolution in the framework.
By the way, do we also have OBR implementation from equinox?
Sincerely,
ChangWoo
Jung
From: Thomas Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org>
Date: 01/21/2008 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
Peter, who parses the filter? If OBR uses a different syntax from the
Framework spec then the FrameworkUtil#createFilter or
BundleContext#createFilter cannot be used. Who is throwing the syntax
error in this case? The Equinox Framework implementation of the OBR
implementation?
Tom
<mime-attachment.gif>Peter Kriens ---01/21/2008 02:27:18 AM---This is
not really true. The OSGi filter and the OBR filter are not required
to be the same. RFC 112 specifically allows the >
<mime-attachment.gif> <mime-attachment.gif>
From: Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mime-attachment.gif> <mime-attachment.gif>
To: BJ Hargrave/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mime-attachment.gif> <mime-attachment.gif>
Cc: Equinox development mailing list <
equinox-dev@eclipse.org>
<mime-attachment.gif> <mime-attachment.gif>
Date: 01/21/2008 02:27 AM
<mime-attachment.gif> <mime-attachment.gif>
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
This is not really true. The OSGi filter and the OBR filter are not
required to be the same. RFC 112 specifically allows the > and < (as
well as some other operators).
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 20 jan 2008, at 15:51, BJ Hargrave wrote:
This may be a problem in the tool (from OSGi) which generates the
xml. OSGi recently decide to add < and > to the set of filter
operators. But this is not in the 4.1 spec. It will be in a future
spec. So the tool which generates the xml should not use the new
operators.
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: +1 386 848 1781 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788
----- Original Message -----
From: ChangWoo Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01/20/2008 07:43 AM
To: Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org>
Cc: Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
I guess I found little bug in the generated OBR repo (
http://download.eclipse.org/releases/europa/repository.zip)
The generated filter seems to be incorrect which throws exception in
the runtime.
For example, Jetty Http Service (org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty), has
dependency on "javax.servlet" which is shown as
Import-Package: javax.servlet;version="[2.4.0,2.5.0)" in the
manifest.
It turns out be generated like below, (which seems to be incorrect),
so it throws "InvalidSyntaxException" when equinox tries to create
the filter upon that.
<require extend='false'
filter='(&(package=javax.servlet)(version>=2.4.0)(version<2.5.0))'
multiple='false' name='package' optional='false'>
Import package javax.servlet ;version=2.4.0
</require>
I guess there is minor bug on creating filter and after applying my
private fix it seems to be working.
wrong:
filter='(&(package=javax.servlet)(version>=2.4.0)(version<2.5.0))'
correct:
filter='(&(package=javax.servlet)(&(version>=2.4.0)(&(version!=2.5.0)(version<=2.5.0))))'
Which component will be the right place to report a bug against that
i can attach my fix there as well? Any pointers?
Thanks.
Sincerely,
ChangWoo Jung
From: Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Equinox development mailing list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org>
Date: 01/12/2008 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] OBR
We currently do host an OBR repo with the major releases. Don't
remember the URL but the required repository.xml/zip file is there
for Callisto and Europa. The OBR client code may be interesting but
our strategic direction is p2. For the most part p2 has (or can be
made to have) the same functionality as the OBR client but goes
further towards solving the wider range of problems we see in the
Eclipse provisioning space.
I am all for supporting the use of OBR repositories in the sense that
some people will make their function available that way. Given the p2
work however, it would be more interesting (to me at least) to write
an OBR repository adaptor for p2 than to use the OBR api. Further, I
hope that eclipse projects will feel comfortable making their content
available as p2 repositories so that the Eclipse user community is
not put in a position of having to get many different provisioning
clients.
In short, we in p2 would very much like to have your interaction and
participation in making a provisioning solution that solves your
needs.
Jeff
Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Equinox development mailing
01/11/2008 10:19 AM list <equinox-dev@eclipse.org>
cc
<mime-attachment.gif>
Subject
Please respond to [equinox-dev] OBR
Equinox development mailing list
<equinox-dev@eclipse.org>
<mime-attachment.gif>
<mime-attachment.gi
f>
Hi,
I'm wonder if any work has been done within Eclipse to deal with OBR
repositories, and if so, how can I get access to that. If not, and if
no
one has a better idea, I'm planning to start an IP-zilla to get the
Apache Felix OBR approved since we will want to map that kind of
repositories in Buckminster and also provide OBR's as an alternative
to
update sites in the spaces project.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
_______________________________________________
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
_______________________________________________ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
