on 1/18/03 1:12 PM, Tom Laird-McConnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any > advice in this forum.]---- > > > The reason message size is restricted is purely due to the way mailing lists > work and the way that people access the internet. > > I restrict the message size to 400K which is a quite reasonable comprimise. > Attachments larger than that should be posted on a web site and a link sent > out. This is appropriate...everyone gets the link and people can view the > materials at their leisure instead of being forced to download them. I > provide web space to do this (ercoupers.com), and there are umpteen free > places you can upload items onto the internet. ( Check out xdrive.com, > http://photos.msn.com/, yahoo.com and a bunch of others.) > > -Tom > >> I would have like to have seen the attachments that were rejected. No one >> is saving postage here, and this would seem a "fair use" (for educational >> purposes) presuming this is copyrighted material. >> >> William R. Bayne >> Yo, Tom (off List)
I just recently signed up for the Fly-In list...don't recall getting this information before. Maybe you know this, and maybe those that have been with you from the first know it, but newbies need more routine reference in a mesage that something was not passed on (such as whether the full message is available in your archive part of the site, or elsewhere - with appropriate reference to access). Just a suggestion...information (and experience) flows both ways. You can't afford to routinely kill the bearer of bad news unless you have a sole source situation which you can count on always remaining so. I believe each of us, in our own way, wants the experience of Ercoupe enthusiasm to be as good as it can be; and nobody knows it all. Regards, William R. Bayne
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
