----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
I absolutely agree with you, Greg. If there's an opening, it should be looked into. Syd Greg Bullough wrote: > ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following > any advice in this forum.]---- Personally, I can't imagine doing an > annual and not looking inside > everything that can physically be looked in! > > Greeg > > At 08:59 PM 4/2/2003 -0600, Sydney Cohen wrote: > > >>----[Please read >>http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this >>forum.]---- >> >> >> >> >> In the previous AD, the holes had to be cut and the interior of the >> wings had to be inspected ONCE. The NPRM for the revision of the >> mandatory service bulletin would require the interior of the wings to >> be inspected again at each annual or 100 hour inspection, whichever >> program the aircraft is under. I personally think this is a good >> idea, and is probably already being done by quite a few mechanics. >> >> Syd Cohen > > ========================================================================== ==== > To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the > archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers/ . ========================================================================== ==== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers/
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
