----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]--------[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this forum.]----
Guys,
I thought
you gave an AD number from 1995.
Isn’t this just a change in the inspection interval on an old AD?
Ed
Burkhead
http://edburkhead.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove the QQQ)
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Bullough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003
1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [COUPERS-FLYIN] AD
I thought that EVERY AD required a
discussion period
after a public notice.
Greg
At 11:20 AM 10/21/2003 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
----[Please read
http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any advice in this
forum.]----
Hi Lynn,
Me, TOO !
I was surprised to see the Ad listed on the web, then recieved a copy in the mail yesterday.
I was surprised that evidently no one knew the Ad was proposed...and no discussions...
I have no problem with recurring inspections...that's what the holes are for...but was really surprized to see "No Comments"....
BTW, I did not revieve any Coupe mail yesterday, or today.....even tho on the archive list, I see both you and Greg have sent messages ..Weird....
Maybe I have been cut off again ???? Tom ???
Wait and see.
Harry==============================================================================To leave this forum go to:http://ercoupers.com/lists.htmSearch the archives onhttp://escribe.com/aviation/coupers/
============================================================================== To leave this forum go to: http://ercoupers.com/lists.htm Search the archives on http://escribe.com/aviation/coupers/
