Guys.

 

The Airworthiness Concern" is based of the Sebring inflight breakup. This is a 
real issue and I don't want to talk this down.

 

I am rather interested in more data on what unauthorized holes would 
incorporate. As we know, Alons have their seat mounts drilled directly into the 
upper spar cap and at the same time even allow a higher gross weight. 

 

Univair should have the data on this , at least drawings and one could conclude 
a certain structural strength from that.

 

If holes were drilled unauthorized, there should be a method to determine 
whether these holes are similar to the alon spars or are a danger to the 
aircraft.

 

At least I would expect a dye check of the affected areas to look for cracks. 
Because I belive there must have been cracks first. The main spar does not 
collapse like this.

If it would then I would not recommend flying any Alon anymore.

 

 

More data would allow a more constructive comment. I hope we will get an answer 
from the FAA, especially Mr. Roger Caldwell.

 

Hartmut

 

http://www.ercoupe.info


 


To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 02:39:05 -0500
Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Improper holes in spar cap




Hi Ed,
......

But we also must encourage responses to this  "Airworthiness Concern Sheet".  I 
have been working on a very comprehensive one for several days.  I will send it 
both by email and U.S.P.S. Certified Mail, Return Receipt requested; and then 
post it to Tech.  That makes it harder for the FAA to "lose" or ignore comments 
(claim they did not get them).  Everyone is welcome reproduce any portion of it 
or incorporate any of my thoughts expressed herein in their comments with the 
single exception of the following:

Should any of us wish to engage in engineering evaluation, i will share a 
letter dated 10/12/49 from ERCO's Thomas M. Mountjoy, Assistant Chief Engineer, 
addressed to the British Joint Services Mission in Washington, D.C.  At that 
time a 415-CD was being officially evaluated in England.

                Airplane limit load factors

        CAR 04  1260 lb.        +4.58   (- not available)
        CAR 03  1400 lb.        +3.50   -1.40

                Limit wing load factors

        CAR 04  1260 lb.        +4.64   -1.75
        CAR 03  1400 lb.        +3.59   -1.32

        Ultimate load factor = 1.5 x limit load factor

And no, I'm not an engineer of any kind either  ;<)

Regards,

William R. Bayne
.____|-(o)-|____.
(Copyright 2009)

-- 

On Sep 20, 2009, at 08:43, Ed Burkhead wrote:

 
One thought:  It seems to me that holes in the upper spar cap would most likely 
be a problem when pulling negative g’s, wouldn’t they?  Or, during extreme 
vibration (i.e. flutter)?  I wouldn’t think normal flying loads within the 
normal positive g limits would strain the upper spar cap.
 
But, then, I’m not an engineer of any kind.
 
Are there appropriate non-destructive diagnostic means to inspect for cracks in 
the spar cap?  Dye penetrant?  Portable x-ray? 
 
Do we have any aeronautical engineers here?
 
Ed                                        
_________________________________________________________________
More than messages–check out the rest of the Windows Live™.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/

Reply via email to