Ok I didn't look that far, but there is confusion around the plane I maintain being a cd or d that's why I looked up those and that was what the comment was about I think.
--- In [email protected], "William R. Bayne" <ercog...@...> wrote: > > > Hi Ruben, > > The only coupe in TC 787 not fitted originally with the C-85 (or a > C-90) is the 415-D. > > Regards, > > WRB > > -- > > On Sep 1, 2010, at 16:45, ruben wrote: > > > I looked it all over yesterday, and you wil need some baffle's when > > you convert a Coupe wich has A-787 as it's TCDS. this applies to > > all models in this TCDS DEPENDING on the prop used. On some props > > listed in the TCDS you don't need the baffles. > > All baffles noted in the TCDS are available from Univair I think > > and wil cost around $1000 total. > > > > On the CD there is also some confusing wich was the case for me. > > They say you can use a 1A90-CF on the 85 but we had a 1A90CF, asked > > Univair and they finaly told me it was the same, the number with > > the "-" does not even exist. > > > > Ruben > > > > --- In [email protected], "William R. Bayne" > > <ercoguru@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi Ed, > >> > >> I agree. > >> > >> Most of our birds have had a number of owners. In some cases logs > >> ("history" of minor modifications legal with a log book entry without > >> CAA/FAA notification) are "missing", in whole or in part. > >> > >> I wanted to make current owners of E and G Model Ercoupes that if > >> these original baffles have somehow disappeared over the years (left > >> off in rebuild, removed and sold, whatever) this is an > >> "airworthiness" issue. All too many of us presume that the plane is > >> "right" as they receive it from the last owner. In most that > >> presumption is inaccurate and can be dangerous. The D Model only > >> requires the baffles if the engine is, as you say, converted to C-85 > >> specs, so my simple, easy to understand comment could not serve the > >> purpose intended had I complicated it to included "some" D Models. > >> > >> Few "simple" statements cover all possible instances, but they can be > >> accurate if carefully worded. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> WRB > >> > >> -- > >> > >> On Aug 30, 2010, at 18:52, Ed Burkhead wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2010-08-29 2:11 AM, William R. Bayne wrote: > >>>> > >>>> the case seems clear that any 415-E or G Ercoupe operating without > >>>> these baffles runs the risk of airworthiness questions. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I think that any C-85 Coupe being flown under the authority of Type > >>> Certificate Data Sheet A-787 must have the baffles. > >>> > >>> Ed > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
