It would appear your sn is 3226.

--- In [email protected], Pizzo Stephen <step...@...> wrote:
>
> Well, I'm new to this group so I jump in at my own peril. I just bought my 
> first plane, a 1946 Ercoupe, N2601H. I think it was No. 3536 in a production 
> run that year of about 4900. I am sure someone will know for sure. Anyway, as 
> to liability etc. As a retired journalist I know all to well the perils of 
> lawyers and lawsuits. But on the other hand if we cannot be open with each 
> other in a forum like this, well, then -- the lawyers win and we lose. I 
> think the best parallel is the open source software world.. where programmers 
> put their open source software out on the open market for anyone to work on, 
> improve and redistribute. It's a powerful way to push any subject forward 
> faster than it gets done in modern corporations where everyone is covering 
> their backside and lawyers are worried someone is going to steal a company 
> secret.
> 
> I love this forum. It's already helped me out with several problems.. like my 
> perennially leaking carburetor ;-)
> 
> So, there. I've tested the waters. 
> 
> Steve Pizzo
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Donald wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Good heavens, is this the same USA I spent 20 years in uniform defending 
> > our freedoms?
> > Heck, now I am not sure I can even READ the bulletins or have a copy in my 
> > possession, might be in trouble for that even, I did stack them in 
> > numerical order, probably an offense too. Good grief!
> > Is this something that has actually happened somewhere, or just a case of 
> > dreaming up a frivolous lawsuit?
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], Ronin Sensei <ronin_sensei@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Risky indeed! Too true.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > By all means, I'd seriously consider the great legal risks involved with 
> > > sharing such information and be most circumspect about publishing or 
> > > releasing it. The potential criminal copyright penalties alone are enough 
> > > to make one have second thoughts. Infringement, fraudulent registration, 
> > > fraudulent claims, or misuse of copyright are also serious issues. 
> > > Claiming copyright on something that somebody else already owns is a big 
> > > deal. This seems a particularly sensitive risk, since copyrights no 
> > > longer need be registered to be effective. Whatever is created is 
> > > automatically under copyright by the FIRST creator. It is hard to tell 
> > > where one might be in violation by claiming rights on somebody else's 
> > > property.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > And then of course, there is the potential for negligence liability, no 
> > > matter what disclaimers are attempted. You never know who will file suit 
> > > or criminal charges, especially among Ercoupers. It looks like expensive 
> > > litigation just waiting to happen.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > So, selling, or even buying BUYING or otherwise trafficking in such 
> > > possible contraband could be very risky, I should think. Anybody who 
> > > touches it might be considered complicit.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I suppose you might be safe giving it away, but only on the sly.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > It appears that the only absolutely secure option is to keep this 
> > > document to yourself. The potential risks of doing otherwise are too 
> > > terrible to imagine. In fact, you might find it safest not to admit that 
> > > it even exists.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Dave Winters
> > > 
> > > 
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > From: ercouper@
> > > Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 00:32:34 +0000
> > > Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Re: mechanical research [was re: fuel pump 
> > > bolt tor   que]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Bill,
> > > You might seriously consider publishing it as a fiction novel and clearly 
> > > state it is not for use on airplanes. I am not being factious. I would 
> > > appreciate having such a publications.
> > > Lee
> > > 
> > > years ago. Titles of ADs, 
> > > > Service Bullletins, etc. often are not indicative of other pertinent 
> > > > information, such as torque values or tightening sequences, rigging 
> > > > or other information of specific routine maintenance or repair 
> > > > importance. I recognized the need to be able to look up specific 
> > > > information in more than one way. Specifically, one can look up the 
> > > > subject of an AD by AD number, but also find the information therein 
> > > > by subject or, if it contains a torque value, under "Torque". Nobody 
> > > > can keep all this in their head, even mechanics who limit their 
> > > > "practice" to Ercoupes, et. al; and I am confident that even our 
> > > > "pros" will want to buy a copy once it is complete and current.
> > > > 
> > > > Note that the second entry is one of many reasons that an Ercoupe 
> > > > owner needs to have, as reference, the Forney Service Manual and 
> > > > Service Bulletins issued by Forney and Alon that apply to earlier 
> > > > Ercoupes. Today most of us have the McCauley metal prop and the 
> > > > Cleveland Wheels and Brakes not covered in the original Ercoupe 
> > > > Service Manual. Here's an example of the last page:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I'm in the process of updating it. "Sources" change (such as the 
> > > > Type Certificates and ADs) or have additions over time.
> > > > 
> > > > I also am undecided as to the wisdom (from a liability standpoint) of 
> > > > including in my cross-reference information from a Chevelle Service 
> > > > Manual, obviously NOT an "authoritative" aviation source, that 
> > > > appears nonetheless pertinent and directly applicable to the proper 
> > > > installation, maintenance and repair of our fuel transfer 
> > > > pumps. ;<) Even with the most carefully worded disclaimer, an 
> > > > author can still be dragged into court and suffer considerable legal 
> > > > expenses in our society of today.
> > > > 
> > > > WRB
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 
> > > > On Sep 1, 2010, at 10:49, Linda Abrams wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Thank you, Paul (and the others who wrote off-list)!
> > > > > So is finding mechanical answers a matter of reading all of the ADs &
> > > > > all of the service manual & all SBs & SMs up front, and then "just"
> > > > > remembering whether/where a topic has been addressed? Or is there
> > > > > some sort of an index that directs you to all the cumulative written
> > > > > sources that apply to each task, or even each system? I know about
> > > > > the great photo essays that Hartmut has begun collecting on his
> > > > > website, but the number of those is still limited. Has any sort of
> > > > > comprehensive written index been created that says something like,
> > > > > e.g. "Fuel pump: see pp.___ of X reference, p. ___ of Y reference,
> > > > > A.D.s ##___, and SB # _____ ?"
> > > > >
> > > > > Linda
> > > > >
> > > > > Paul Anton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ad 81-07-06 Paragraph (3)e specifies both gaskets are to be 
> > > > > replaced and
> > > > > torque of 30 +- 5 inch pounds
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> Pizzo Stephen
> http://www.stephen.pizzo.com
> 
> "Never do anything you don't want to have to explain to the paramedics."
>


Reply via email to