>
> I like it. But I'm starting to think that {meta} is a bad word for
> it. It's not very descriptive of what's actually happening. Of
> course, I don't have any better suggestions :) Maybe
> {with_properties} or {set_properties} or something?Yeah, I agree. I think 'with_properties' and 'set_properties' sounds too generic, though. Maybe 'with_meta_vals' or 'with_phased_vals'? > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to erlyweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
