> Yeah, I agree. I think 'with_properties' and 'set_properties' sounds > too generic, though. Maybe 'with_meta_vals' or 'with_phased_vals'?
I like with_phased_vals, that's relatively clear --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to erlyweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
